To know and worship God (Qur'an 51:56) — which gives everything else, work and family included, its meaning. Life is a test (Qur'an 67:2); the One who made you defines what you are for.
What is the purpose of human life — what gives it meaning?
No purpose is given from outside; meaning is made, not found. Atheist thinkers locate it in love, work, knowledge, beauty, and leaving the world a little better — purposes that, they argue, are not less real for being human.
Agnosticism assigns none, and says so plainly: no purpose can be read off a universe whose author, if any, is unknown. Meaning is therefore built, not found — in work, love, inquiry, and whatever a person judges worth their life; most agnostics take this framework from humanism.
To know, love, and glorify God, and to love others: the Westminster Catechism answers that man's chief end is 'to glorify God and enjoy him forever.' Augustine made it personal: 'you have made us for yourself, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.'
To love and serve God, keep the covenant, and sanctify ordinary life — and, in the rabbinic phrase, to act as God's partner in perfecting the world. Meaning is found inside obligation: study, family, honest work, community, and justice.
To awaken: to end craving and ignorance, and so end suffering — for oneself in the Theravada framing, for all beings in the Mahayana. Meaning is found in walking the path itself: a life of ethics, meditation, and growing wisdom.
The tradition licenses four aims — righteous duty, prosperity, pleasure, and liberation — but the last is the true goal: to know the self and be freed from rebirth, or, in the devotional schools, to reach eternal loving union with God. Meaning is not invented; it is discovered by finding what you already are.
To remember God and live truthfully, and so gain what human birth was given for: union with the One and release from the cycle of birth and death. Meaning is found now — in devotion, honest work, and service — not only at the end.
It gives no answer, and holds that this is exactly what a state must never do: define the meaning of its citizens' lives. Rawls framed it as neutrality among conceptions of the good — the framework protects each person's pursuit of an answer without endorsing any.
Meaning is made, not given: it is built from love, work, learning, and service to humane ideals. Humanists argue that a purpose we choose and share is no less real for being human.
For each person to determine. Liberalism refuses to assign life a single purpose; it protects the conditions — liberty, education, security — under which each pursues, in Mill's words, 'his own good in his own way.'
Feminism does not define life's purpose — it is a movement, not a religion. It offers a cause within whatever purpose a person already holds: that no life be narrowed because of its sex.
It gives no complete answer, but it teaches that a life gains meaning by belonging to, and serving, a people whose story began before you and continues after you. Mazzini taught that the nation is the workshop in which each person serves humanity.
THE SAME WORDING, PUT TO EVERY WORLDVIEW — EACH ANSWERS IN ITS OWN TERMS, IN ITS STRONGEST FORM
Didn't He Say