Nothing in human nature is broken. People are born pure, knowing their Maker — then bury that knowledge under distraction and desire. The problem is forgetting God and worshipping things instead of Him.
What does it say is the main problem with humanity or the world?
Most atheist thinkers locate the main problem in ignorance, superstition, and dogma — belief held without evidence — which keep humanity from understanding the world and from fixing what harms it.
Agnosticism diagnoses one problem precisely: people claim certainty about ultimate questions that the evidence cannot support. Huxley treated such over-claiming as a moral fault, not only an intellectual one; for a fuller account of what ails humanity, agnostics look to other frameworks, most often humanism.
Sin: humanity has turned away from God, and this broken relationship distorts everything else. The New Testament states that 'all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God' (Romans 3:23).
Judaism does not teach that humanity is fallen beyond repair; the problem is that people, given free choice, turn from God's will — Genesis calls it the inclination of the human heart toward evil — so the world remains unredeemed and waiting for repair.
Buddhist texts teach that the deepest problem is dukkha — the suffering and unsatisfactoriness running through ordinary life — driven by craving and ignorance. Even pleasures fail to satisfy, because everything we grasp at is impermanent.
Ignorance (avidya): humans do not know their true self (atman) and so remain bound to samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth driven by karma. The Upanishads treat this ignorance — not sin against a lawgiver — as the root problem.
That people live centred on the self — the Gurus call it haumai, roughly 'me-me' — instead of on God. This ego-centredness cuts a person off from the One who is present everywhere, and it breeds greed, pride, and empty ritual.
Secularist thinkers name a political problem, not a cosmic one: when state power and religious authority merge, the result is persecution, civil strife, and corrupted religion. Locke argued that rulers who enforce belief produce fear and hypocrisy, never sincere faith.
Humanists say the main problem is human suffering, ignorance, and injustice — not sin against a god. These come from natural conditions and human choices, and can therefore be reduced by human effort.
Concentrated, unaccountable power. Liberal thinkers from Locke to Judith Shklar locate the great danger in rulers — and majorities — who coerce conscience, speech, body, and property; Shklar called cruelty backed by power the first of vices.
The main problem, feminists hold, is patriarchy: societies arranged so that men hold most power and women are subordinated by law, custom, and institution — in de Beauvoir's analysis, woman is cast as 'the Other.'
Nationalists say the great wrong is a people denied its own life: ruled by foreigners or empires, its language and culture pushed aside, its members left rootless. Mazzini taught that humanity is disfigured whenever a nation is enslaved.
Mazzini, The Duties of Man; Herder's writings on language and Volk
THE SAME WORDING, PUT TO EVERY WORLDVIEW — EACH ANSWERS IN ITS OWN TERMS, IN ITS STRONGEST FORM
Didn't He Say